The common problems and risks of laboratory equipment, drug management, environmental control, etc. have been introduced in detail in the previous section. Next, I will explain the common problems and risks of laboratory decoration in detail.

Ⅶ. Problems and risks of honest service supervision

1. The integrity service system, laboratory qualifications, approved inspection and testing capabilities, procedures, and charging standards of individual laboratories are not disclosed to customers.

2. No customer feedback location identification and measures.

3. Lack of records to actively solicit customer opinions and conduct analysis and evaluation.

4. There is no avoidance system for food inspection agencies.

Ⅷ. Problems and risks of test reports and original record

1. The information content of some laboratory reports does not cover the necessary information according to the requirements of the assessment criteria, without description of the sample status, and lack of information on the equipment used.

2. The inspection basis is not specific and unclear.

3. The technical requirements column of the inspection report did not fill in the standard limits of the relevant test items and lacked the basis for individual judgments.

4. There is no end mark and no riding seal.

5. The original records corresponding to the inspection report are not numbered.

6. Part of the original inspection records did not fill in the test date, did not have the signature of the sample preparation tester, and was randomly altered.

7. The copy of the report is incompletely archived, and the power of attorney, sampling list, circulation card and original record with the same number are archived separately.

8. The sample number in the test report is inconsistent with the sample number in the "Sampling Inspection Agreement/Sampling Record".

9. The test report is approved by an unauthorized signatory.

Ⅸ. Problems and risks of internal audit

1. Individual laboratories mainly showed that the content of the internal audit plan was not specific and failed to carry out internal audits as planned. The internal audit work did not cover all elements and departments of the management system, such as management.

2. The internal auditors have not obtained the internal auditor certificate, the internal audit checklist lacks pertinence, the description of the inspections in the checklist is too general, and there is no reason analysis for the non-conformities found, and the non-conformities issued are avoided and ignored. In actual work There are non-conformities found in internal audits that have not been effectively rectified in a timely manner.

3. Insufficient input for management review of individual laboratories, inadequate analysis of work status, perfunctory review reports, no review conclusions, inability to formulate effective improvement measures for the problems found, and the results of improvement measures have not been verified.

Ⅹ. Problems and risks of internal supervision

1. Supervision does not play its due role in individual laboratories. It is mainly manifested in the lack of supervisory appointment documents, the insufficient number of supervisors, and the professional competence of supervisors that cannot cover the inspection areas involved.

2. There are no supervision work requirements and procedures in the system documents, no supervision work plan is established, daily supervision is not paid attention to, corrective measures are formulated for problems found in supervision without analysis of causes, or effect verification is not carried out after implementing corrective measures.

3. Some laboratories have not established and implemented a standard novelty system for uninterrupted tracking and regular cleaning and inspection of in-use standards, and expired standards are still used in inspections.

4. A considerable number of laboratories did not confirm the standard change, and did not go to the qualification accreditation management department to go through the standard change procedures in time.